About Me

Name: Charly Hornbrook...
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 
American Eagle Golf Gifts
Suwannee River Retreads

Obama's next target for his continued destruction of the American way of life...

"While the people have property, arms in their hands, and only a spark of noble spirit, the most corrupt Congress must be mad to form any project of tyranny."  Rev. Nicholas Collin, Fayetteville Gazette (N.C.), October 12, 1789

HR 45 Blair Holt Firearm Licensing & Record of Sales Act of 2009 has to be the most manical piece of legislation put before Congress in decades.  Adolph would have loved it!

The Brady Campaign and others of their ilk, have to be the most uniformed group of people that walk upright and have the ability to speak a formal language, on this planet.   They seems to be willing to totally ignore the fact that "criminals" do not obey laws, that is why they are called "criminals". DUH! (noun:  One who has committed or been legally convicted of a crime.) 
 
However, that truism does not deter these types of liberals from continuing to try to impose their warped sense of values onto law-abiding citizens.  If you manage to get their attention for a moment, ask them how keeping law-abiding Americans from protecting themselves and their loved ones from muggers, rapists, gangs, etc., will affect the crime rate?   Now, be aware that liberals are totally confused by facts, because it blows holes in every argument they have.  Their unfounded and incorrect assumptions can never stand up to the light of the truth.   So, they tend to speak in general terms and when you show them that they are wrong, usually the response is something like "...well that is irrelevant..." or they try to turn your question around by answering your question with their question...thereby avoiding having to give you a direct response.
 
The crime rate in America is down wherever law-abiding citizens are allowed to own weapons of self-defense.  No ifs, ands or buts...it is a simple provable fact!  End of argument...end of discussion.  Where there are restrictive laws, here and around the world, crime is up because criminals, even the dumber ones, know it is safer to rob someone who is unarmed.  If a potential house break-er-inner is looking at two houses sitting side by side, trying to decide where to rob, which one do you think he will choose? - The one with a sign on the door that reads: "WE DO NOT CALL 911!" or one that has a "I LOVE LIBERALS poster in the front yard?   I suspect even today's uneducated high-school students know the answer to this one.
 
A statement I really like is the one that says:  "I CARRY A GUN BECAUSE A COP IS TOO HEAVY!"  If you do not believe in protecting yourself or your family, then that is your choice.  But don't get indignant when the police don't get there in time, just keep hitting the criminal with your floor mop!....that oughta scare the hell out of him!
 
The 2nd Amendment is the second one written because it protects the First Amendment.  George Mason in the constitutional debate of 1788 wrote:  "...to disarm the people - that is the best and most effectual way to enslave them."  This was the credo of Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin, Hussein, Castro, Pol Pot, Kim Jong and other dictators.  If Barack Hussein Obama gets his way the Constitution will be rendered ineffective in just 4 years.  He has a rubber-stamp Congress now so there is no stopping his path to Kingship. 
 
When they took the 4th Amendment, I was quiet because I didn't deal drugs.
When they took the 6th Amendment, I was quiet because I am innocent.
When they took the 2nd Amendment, I was quiet because I don't own a gun.
Now they have taken the 1st Amendment, and I can only be quiet.
– Lyle Myhr
 
You must get involved before it is too late and you can "only be quiet..."
 
 
 
 
 
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama's outlook for the future? 'bout 12 feet ahead!

Another poignant comment from Newt:

When campaigning for his economic stimulus bill this past winter, President Obama and his allies in Congress promised the bill would prevent unemployment from exceeding 8%. Last month, we reached 9.5% unemployment and President Obama conceded it will likely reach 10%.  Worse, the huge increase in our money supply and the mountains of debt being racked up by the Federal Reserve create the ominous specter of an inflationary environment that would slow down our economic recovery.

It's obvious to all but the most fervent left-wing ideologues that the "stimulus" - passed in haste by Congress without being read - has failed. Of course, this hasn't stopped the same people who brought us Stimulus One to begin production on a sequel. And with a new 60 seat majority in the Senate and Pelosi's Puppets in charge in the House, some think another big-government, pork-laden bill that would do little for economic growth and drive us deeper in debt is inevitable. 
 
It is becoming increasingly clear to the country that the Left's $787 billion spending bill was not a "stimulus package." It was, instead, a "politician payoff package" in which the most rapidly spent money went to state and local governments.

Vice President Biden - out campaigning on behalf of their failed spending bill - has been quick to point out that the stimulus has "saved" government jobs that would have been cut.  (
We need to cut down the bloated government payroll, not save or expand it!  DUH Ed.)

But that money only solved this year's problems. What about next year? And the years after that? All that the stimulus has done has allowed state governments to delay making the hard spending choices necessary to reform their bureaucracies.
 
As usual, Obama and his cronies are only concerned about how they look today, they have no care for the future...ed.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »