About Me

Name: Charly Hornbrook...
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 
American Eagle Golf Gifts
Suwannee River Retreads

Term Limits - 6 years and out you go!

It's time to dredge up the familiar hue and cry:  Throw the bums out!   Well sure, after 6 years let's remove them all from office.  Yep, President, VP, Senators, Representatives, State offices, County offices, local offices, etc...no more than 6 years consecutively.  If they want to skip six and run again, well that's OK.  But get whatever you have promised the voters, done in 6 years and then leave the next six to somebody else.  That way none of your paid time goes toward getting re-elected.  No money, no effort, no worrying about how you voted or acted will affect your next run for office.  No campaign committees, no speeches, no expensive travel, no smoozing the voters, no cocktail parties, nothing NaDa!
 
Every elected official can spend all their working days doing something productive, something that will benefit Americans, something that actually might work as intended, instead of getting all tangled up in bureaucratic gobbledegook & politicking.
 
Another benefit is that America does not have to pay for elections every two years...WOW, another big savings to every level of government, national, state and local.  
 
Oh by the way, no big retirement plans for any elected official.   They run for office and serve entirely out of their desire to help the world.  Of course they get a salary for their 6 years' stint, but no more than what they were making in the private sector.   Yes, they get their office expenses paid, but no perks!  No Franking privileges except when contacting constituents.  Maybe free web service, telephone and copy paper, but not much more.
 
I wonder how many so-called honest politicians would be willing to run for office under these conditions?  Those who brag they are Good Guys on only wanting to help America or their community...would they still be getting in line to announce their candidacy under these restrictions? 
 
I doubt it, and I bet you do too. 
 
 
 
Tags: TERM LIMITS  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Email Hoaxes: Don't just forward it...Stop the lies...

If you have an email InBox, you get lots of SPAM and some of it falls under the headings of Hoaxes, Urban Legends, Bogus Virus Warnings, etc.  If you want to be part of the solution, not part of the problem - DON"T PASS IT ON!   When you get one of those emails that talks about GOD being left off a new coin or a Pepsi can, or a virus that will eat your computer, check it out.  There is a plethora of websites that specialized in debunking (or confirming) these types of claims.  It takes only a few keystrokes to verify if the information is correct or just another hacker's attempt to scare those who believe almost everything.  (just put the word HOAX in your search box). The person who starts these rumors knows that most email users are basically too lazy to go the next step and check out if it is true...they prefer just to pass these falsehoods on to their list of friends -without verification.   It seems harmless enough, slandering a person or a company all while remaining anonymous.  If this same person were to take out a newspaper ad and make the same false accusation, they would soon find themselves in court. 
 
So, what to do if you want to be a responsible Internet user?  1.  Read it   2. Check it out  3. Delete it if it is false and notify the sender of your findings.    If you don't want to be a responsible person, then just delete it without comment or pass it on with some sort of comment like: "I didn't check this out, but..."
 
The Email Internet is exponential.  If your friend sends you a hoax and also sends it to 9 others, that's 10 people who read it.  Now, if each of those ten forward it on to their ten buddies, then 100 people are now reading it and if they pass it on to 10 of their friends we have 1000  people getting bad information.  Should each of those 1000 pass it on to 10 on their contact list the readership rises to 10,000.  Add ten more from these folks and we hit 100,000 and ten more we are at 1 million readers, 10 more and we are up to 10 million, etc...and on and on...all getting false statements, and that could seriously affect a business like Pepsi for example, or a politician like Sarah Palin, who is completely innocent of the charges.   The speed of the Internet is frightening isn't it?  It only takes an email about one second to get to it's destination anywhere in the world.  So a lie gets around just as fast as the truth. 
 
Next time you get one of the "would-you-believe...." emails, PLEASE take the time to check it out with Snopes, TruthorFiction, UrbanLegends, Hoax-Slayer, HoaxBusters or one of the other dozen resource web sites.  If it is false, tell the sender or better yet, hit the Reply All button on your email program and let everyone who got it know it is a hoax.  If we all do this every time, we can make a difference in the Email Inbox Clutter.
 
It is another reason the Conservative point of view is so superior to those spouting liberalism.  Liberals just don't care to be responsible...very selfish folks most of the time.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

ObamaCare....in a word: STINKS!

Take a look at the 1005 page health care bill...boggles the mind of anybody who is not a Harvard lawyer.  However, since our elected officials seem not interested in reading legislation ahead of time, it should not be a roadblock to voting.   Heck, they did not read the Stimulus Bill before reading it, so why break the routine?

Start with the nutcase, Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, the brother of White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel. Savings, he writes, will require changing how doctors think about their patients: Doctors take the Hippocratic Oath too seriously, as an imperative to do everything for the patient regardless of the cost or effects on others.  Emanuel wants doctors to look beyond the needs of their patients and consider social justice, such as whether the money could be better spent on somebody else.  Obama wants to deny health care depending on age.  Guess what age bracket he wants to deny?  How about requiring pychological counseling every 5 years to discuss how to end your life if you are not healthy and curable.  This sounds suspiciously like defacto euthanasia to me.
 
He also believes that "communitarianism" (wheverthehellthatis) should guide decisions on who gets care. He says medical care should be reserved for the non-disabled, not given to those "who are irreversibly prevented from being or becoming participating citizens" . . . An obvious example is not guaranteeing health services to patients with dementia or cerebral palsy or incurable heart conditions or unfixable bad backs....
 
The bill being rushed through Congress will be paid for largely by a $500 billion-plus cut in Medicare over 10 years. Knowing how unpopular the cuts will be, the president's budget director, Peter Orszag, urged Congress this week to delegate its own authority over Medicare to a new, Presidentially-appointed bureaucracy that wouldn't be accountable to the public.

Scary stuff folks...read more at:
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

It is just as much our fault...

Rarely agree with Pat Buchanan, but what he says about this current set of problems being our fault,  is pretty accurate.  WE are just as much to blame by electing these congressmen in the first place and then we keep reelecting them when we have a chance to kick them out.  One of the pointing fingers has to be aimed at our own chests.  We were at our financial best on Jan 19, 2007 and then the roof fell in.  In just two years and two months, the Dow dropped from 14,164 to 7,000 However, not all the blame can be laid upon the Dems...there were plenty of Republicans who failed to voice a strong opposition vote.  Had Bush's budget and fiduciary recommendations been followed, we would not be into a recession...that is fact.  But, while hindsight is always 20-20, we must fight against BHO's trillion plus budget.  This so-called stimulus package will obligate children born in 2050 to pay its bills! Our elected officials must hear a great uproar from all of us....NO MORE OF OUR MONEY FOR PORK!  NO MORE OF OUR MONEY FOR THOSE WHO REFUSE TO WORK FOR IT.  ABSOLUTELY NO ONE DESERVES A GOVERNMENT HANDOUT!  Our government has never in history earned one single dollar.  It  takes the money from those who work for it and gives it to those who refuse to.  It is sort of like getting a blood transfusion from your left arm to your right arm...with a leaky hose!
 

What's a trillion dollars?   A trillion dollars = $1,000,000,000,000.  That's 12 zeroes to the left of the decimal point. A trillion is a million million dollars. Someone smarter than me figured out that if you laid one dollar bills end to end, you could make a chain that stretches from earth to the moon and back again 200 times before you ran out of dollar bills! One trillion dollars would stretch nearly from the earth to the sun. It would take a military jet flying at the speed of sound, reeling out a roll of dollar bills behind it, 14 years before it reeled out one trillion dollar bills.  That is mind-boggling. 

 It only took Obama 60 days to go from savior to dunce, fast even by Washington standards...a record that the historically worst co-Presidents, Bill and Hillary, did not reach as quickly.  While it's true Obama succeeded in stealing the election through ACORN & voter fraud in many states and getting a trillion dollar pork package through a Democratic congress, his immediate failures in foreign relations, moral transparency, fiscal irresponsibility, overall arrogance plus a host of irresponsible cabinet selections, certainly have taken our economy as well as our country down the path toward destruction and have made us the laughing stock of the world.  Is this the change the Bush-haters voted for?  I don't think so, but they were warned!  Of course if you don't want the free money to stop, you vote for the guy who promises to keep buying your beer and cigarettes.

We all must work hard so this guy is thrown out of office in 2012, if not before.  However, impeachment for incompetency has never worked before, so it must come from those of us who believe in the work ethic.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What have we learned over two millenia?

"The budget should be balanced, the Treasury should be refilled, public debt should be reduced, the arrogance of officialdom should be tempered and controlled, and the assistance to foreign land should be curtailed lest Rome become bankrupt. People must again learn to work, instead of living on public assistance."
       -- Cicero , 55 BC

       Evidently, not a damn thing...

...because here it is 2000 years later and we have a budget that is horribly out-of-balance, the Treasury is empty, public debt is at an all-time high, Obama's arrogance is unprecedented and definitely out of control, we give away tax-payers money so other countries won't have our debt problems and we could care less if we go bankrupt.  People have learned to live on public assistance and forgotten the work ethic.   Our founding fathers would be ashamed of us. 
Yep, we have not learned a damned thing!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Just Wondering.......

Got this email yesterday...good stuff to pass along.  George Will in The Freedom Post

If George W. Bush had given Gordon Brown a set of inexpensive an incorrectly formatted DVDs, when Gordon Brown had given him a thoughtful and historically significant gift, would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had given the Queen of England an iPod containing videos of his speeches, would you have thought this embarrassingly narcissistic and tacky?

If George W. Bush had bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia, would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had visited Austria  and made reference to the non-existent "Austrian language," would you have brushed it off as a minor slip?

If George W. Bush had filled his cabinet and circle of advisers with people who cannot seem to keep current on their income taxes, would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had been so Spanish illiterate as to refer to Cinco de Cuatro in front of the Mexican ambassador when it was the fourth of May (Cuatro de Mayo), and continued to flub it when he tried again, would you have winced in embarrassment?

If George W. Bush had mis-spelled the word advice would you have hammered him for it for years like the media did Dan Quayle and potatoeis as proof of what a dunce he is?

If George W. Bush had burned 9,000 gallons of jet fuel to go plant a single tree on Earth Day, would you have concluded him a hypocrite?

If George W. Bush administration had okayed Air Force One flying low over millions of people followed by a jet fighter in downtown Manhattan causing widespread panic, would you have wondered whether they actually get what happened on 9-11?

If George W. Bush had been the first President to need a teleprompter installed to be able to get through a press conference, would you have laughed and said this is more proof of how he inept he is on his own and is really controlled by smarter men behind the scenes?

If George W. Bush had failed to send relief aid to flood victims throughout the Midwest with more people killed or made homelessthan in New Orleans , would you want it made into a major ongoing political issue with claims of racism and incompetence?

 If George W. Bush had ordered the firing of the CEO of a major corporation, even though he had no constitutional authority to do so,would you have approved?

 If George W. Bush had proposed to double the national debt, which had taken more than two centuries to accumulate, in one year, would youhave approved? If GWB had then proposed to double the debt again within 10 years, would you have approved?

 If George W. Bush had reduced your retirement plan holdings of GM stock by 90% and given the unions, free, a majority stake in GM, would you
have approved?

 If George W. Bush had spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to take Laura Bush to a play in NYC, would you have approved?

 So, tell me, what is it about Obama, other than the media reporting, that makes him so brilliant and impressive? Can't think of anything? Don't worry. He's done all this in just 6 months -- so you'll have three years and six months to come up with an answer.

 Naive incompetence, black power & uninformed voters did this to themselves.

-- 



 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What it means to be a GG...

What is a "Good Guy"? (or gal) It is a patriotic person?  Is it being nice to everybody?  Is it being a good parent?...or is it a lot more than that?   I got to thinking about this the other day while driving and mentally began to jot down some things that must define a GG.  For starters, how about cutting down on the energy each of us use every day.  We can ya know!
  • Reducing your own personal energy use - by using fluorescent bulbs in every single socket in your home.
  • Driving a smaller 4 cyl car.  We just simply have to get rid of this ego that says we have to have big V6 or V-8 fuel-inefficient vehicles for our personal running-around.  20 - 25 mpg combined obviously is just not getting it done!
  • Another thing we could all do is TURN OUT THE LIGHTS WHEN WE LEAVE THE ROOM!
  • Turn off you computer overnight.
  • Put your pool pump on a timer.  Don't run it 24/7
  • Replace outside security light bulbs with more efficient ones that don't "leak" light up toward the sky.
  • Turn you A/C up just 2 degrees and your furnace down by 2 degrees. Cold?...put on a sweater. Hot?...take it off.
  • Limit your trips to one a week...combine your errands and appointments. Avg Cost Per Mile is now over 70 cents.
  • Use the WWII slogan:  "Is this trip really necessary?"
Folks, we must do something to reduce our energy use in this country - Now!  Or, we will soon have no oil for gasoline, then what? If the Arabs cut us off again we are cooked. Hydro-electric dams are ruining our rivers, coal-fired plants are ruining the air we all breath.  And the pollution from these activities is ruining our land.  And yet we ban the safest form of energy  - Nuclear, because of some ill-founded fears and misinformation. France gets 77%  from nuclear, Japan 35% while we get only 19%.  Surely we are a lot smarter than that. 
 
Remember the phrase: Charity starts at home?  Well, energy saving starts at home - with you - today!  That is part of what being a Conservative is all about.  You CONSERVE! 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Good Advice to maybe help you keep your job!

When your boss has to lay off or fire a certain number of employees, what are his rules for who to keep and who to let go?  This time-honored writing of Elbert Hubbard may make the difference in your job security.  Read it and maybe even put it on your desk or wall as a constant reminder.

 "If you work for a man, in heaven's name..WORK for him!
 
If he pays you wages which supply your bread and butter, speak well of him; stand by him & the institution he represents.  If put to a pinch, an ounce of loyalty is worth a pound of cleverness.  If you must vilify, condemn and eternally disparage - Resign your position and when you are outside, damn to your heart's content.  But, as long as your are part of the institution, do not condemn it.  If you do that, you are loosening the tendrils that are holding you to that institution and by the first high wind that comes along, you will be uprooted and blown away and probably will never know the reason why." 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama's next target for his continued destruction of the American way of life...

"While the people have property, arms in their hands, and only a spark of noble spirit, the most corrupt Congress must be mad to form any project of tyranny."  Rev. Nicholas Collin, Fayetteville Gazette (N.C.), October 12, 1789

HR 45 Blair Holt Firearm Licensing & Record of Sales Act of 2009 has to be the most manical piece of legislation put before Congress in decades.  Adolph would have loved it!

The Brady Campaign and others of their ilk, have to be the most uniformed group of people that walk upright and have the ability to speak a formal language, on this planet.   They seems to be willing to totally ignore the fact that "criminals" do not obey laws, that is why they are called "criminals". DUH! (noun:  One who has committed or been legally convicted of a crime.) 
 
However, that truism does not deter these types of liberals from continuing to try to impose their warped sense of values onto law-abiding citizens.  If you manage to get their attention for a moment, ask them how keeping law-abiding Americans from protecting themselves and their loved ones from muggers, rapists, gangs, etc., will affect the crime rate?   Now, be aware that liberals are totally confused by facts, because it blows holes in every argument they have.  Their unfounded and incorrect assumptions can never stand up to the light of the truth.   So, they tend to speak in general terms and when you show them that they are wrong, usually the response is something like "...well that is irrelevant..." or they try to turn your question around by answering your question with their question...thereby avoiding having to give you a direct response.
 
The crime rate in America is down wherever law-abiding citizens are allowed to own weapons of self-defense.  No ifs, ands or buts...it is a simple provable fact!  End of argument...end of discussion.  Where there are restrictive laws, here and around the world, crime is up because criminals, even the dumber ones, know it is safer to rob someone who is unarmed.  If a potential house break-er-inner is looking at two houses sitting side by side, trying to decide where to rob, which one do you think he will choose? - The one with a sign on the door that reads: "WE DO NOT CALL 911!" or one that has a "I LOVE LIBERALS poster in the front yard?   I suspect even today's uneducated high-school students know the answer to this one.
 
A statement I really like is the one that says:  "I CARRY A GUN BECAUSE A COP IS TOO HEAVY!"  If you do not believe in protecting yourself or your family, then that is your choice.  But don't get indignant when the police don't get there in time, just keep hitting the criminal with your floor mop!....that oughta scare the hell out of him!
 
The 2nd Amendment is the second one written because it protects the First Amendment.  George Mason in the constitutional debate of 1788 wrote:  "...to disarm the people - that is the best and most effectual way to enslave them."  This was the credo of Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin, Hussein, Castro, Pol Pot, Kim Jong and other dictators.  If Barack Hussein Obama gets his way the Constitution will be rendered ineffective in just 4 years.  He has a rubber-stamp Congress now so there is no stopping his path to Kingship. 
 
When they took the 4th Amendment, I was quiet because I didn't deal drugs.
When they took the 6th Amendment, I was quiet because I am innocent.
When they took the 2nd Amendment, I was quiet because I don't own a gun.
Now they have taken the 1st Amendment, and I can only be quiet.
– Lyle Myhr
 
You must get involved before it is too late and you can "only be quiet..."
 
 
 
 
 
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama's outlook for the future? 'bout 12 feet ahead!

Another poignant comment from Newt:

When campaigning for his economic stimulus bill this past winter, President Obama and his allies in Congress promised the bill would prevent unemployment from exceeding 8%. Last month, we reached 9.5% unemployment and President Obama conceded it will likely reach 10%.  Worse, the huge increase in our money supply and the mountains of debt being racked up by the Federal Reserve create the ominous specter of an inflationary environment that would slow down our economic recovery.

It's obvious to all but the most fervent left-wing ideologues that the "stimulus" - passed in haste by Congress without being read - has failed. Of course, this hasn't stopped the same people who brought us Stimulus One to begin production on a sequel. And with a new 60 seat majority in the Senate and Pelosi's Puppets in charge in the House, some think another big-government, pork-laden bill that would do little for economic growth and drive us deeper in debt is inevitable. 
 
It is becoming increasingly clear to the country that the Left's $787 billion spending bill was not a "stimulus package." It was, instead, a "politician payoff package" in which the most rapidly spent money went to state and local governments.

Vice President Biden - out campaigning on behalf of their failed spending bill - has been quick to point out that the stimulus has "saved" government jobs that would have been cut.  (
We need to cut down the bloated government payroll, not save or expand it!  DUH Ed.)

But that money only solved this year's problems. What about next year? And the years after that? All that the stimulus has done has allowed state governments to delay making the hard spending choices necessary to reform their bureaucracies.
 
As usual, Obama and his cronies are only concerned about how they look today, they have no care for the future...ed.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

President Obama Promised to End the Influence of Special Interests in Washington, Then He Gave 55% of Chrysler to His Union Supporters

 
For the weekend, some poignant thoughts from Newt.  I just pass them along as worth a read.
 
Obama campaigned to end the influence of special interests in the nation's capital. But as president he's rewarded his political supporters at the expense of economic recovery in the stimulus bill and paid back his union allies at the expense of the rule of law in the Chrysler and GM bankruptcies.

The Obama-Pelosi-Reid team is the most radical group ever to hold the reigns of American power. Their vision of a high tax, big bureaucracy Washington-centered system dominated by politicians and leading to a secular-socialist future will fundamentally challenge America's role as a beacon of hope, opportunity and freedom."
 
Barack Obama campaigned as a leader who would bring a new kind of politics to Washington. Then he used Chicago-style politics - twisting arms and offering payoffs - to pass one of the largest tax increases in American history in the cap and trade bill.

When the Left takes for granted the superiority of big government,  We on the Right side of America must argue forcefully for free enterprise.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A vew from another saddle....

I recently received this email by Lou Pritchett, a well-known public speaker who retired after a successful 36-year career as the VP World Sales for Proctor and Gamble.


 

Lou Pritchett is one of corporate America 's true living legends- an acclaimed author, dynamic teacher and one of the world's highest rated speakers. Successful corporate executives everywhere recognize him as the foremost leader in change management. Lou changed the way America does business by creating an audacious concept that came to be known as "partnering." Pritchett rose from soap salesman to Vice-President, Sales and Customer Development for Procter and Gamble and over the course of 36 years, made corporate history.


 

AN OPEN LETTER TO PRESIDENT OBAMA


Dear President Obama:


 You are the thirteenth President under whom I have lived and unlike any of the others, you truly scare me.  


 You scare me because after months of exposure, I know nothing about you.


 You scare me because I do not know how you paid for your expensive Ivy League education and your upscale lifestyle and housing with no visible signs of support.    


 You scare me because you did not spend the formative years of youth growing up in America and culturally you are not an American.


 You scare me because you have never run a company or met a payroll.


 You scare me because you have never had military experience, thus don't understand it at its core.


 You scare me because you lack humility and 'class', and are always blaming others.   


 You scare me because for over half your life you have aligned yourself with radical extremists who hate America and you refuse to publicly denounce these radicals who wish to see America fail.


 You scare me because you are a cheerleader for the 'blame America ' crowd and deliver this message abroad.


 You scare me because you want to change  America to a European style country where the government sector dominates instead of the private sector. 


 You scare me because you want to replace our health care system with a government controlled one. 


 You scare me because you prefer 'wind mills' to responsibly capitalizing on our own vast oil, coal and shale reserves.


 You scare me because you want to kill the American capitalist goose that lays the golden egg which provides the highest standard of living in the world.


 You scare me because you have begun to use 'extortion' tactics against certain banks and corporations.


 You scare me because your own political party shrinks from challenging you on your wild and irresponsible spending proposals.


 You scare me because you will not openly listen to or even consider opposing points of view from intelligent people.


 You scare me because you falsely believe that you are both omnipotent and omniscient.


 You scare me because the media gives you a free pass on everything you do.


 You scare me because you demonize and want to silence the Limbaughs, Hannitys, O'Relllys and Becks who offer opposing, conservative points of view.


 You scare me because you prefer controlling over governing. 


 Finally, you scare me because if you serve a second term I will probably not feel safe in writing a similar letter in 8 years.


 Lou Pritchett

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

How long before you admit that voting for Obama was a mistake?

 Do you have the character to say to yourself and others: "WOW, did I get it wrong!...I apologize to my fellow Patriotic Americans for helping to put them in the current mess" .   For most voters who keep up with what is going on, Obama is already the worst President in the history of our country and it took him only 160 days!  And, when you consider that group includes Carter and the Clintons, it seems absurd that so many folks voted for him.  How could that happen, you might ask?  Well, when you consider the "news" was tightly controlled by the Liberal press, it is easy to understand why Americans never heard the truth about this guy.  We were feed daily pap about how great his past was and how great the future would be under him.  The press never dug into his checkered past, his socialistic views, his communist associations, his total lack of management skills - they just took him at his word(s).  "I like what he says" one friend told me.  Neveryoumind he lied daily to anyone who would listen.  One of the great talents of all charlatans is their ability to convince the masses of their product by the use of flowery phrases, unsupported claims of success and impossible claims of the future accomplishment.   He was able to make the Liberals feel good again and the press helped voters view Bush as the bad guy.  Obama's victory was not so much a win for him as it was a defeat of Bush.  He did not run against McCain he ran against Bush by saying McCain would be "just another George".  I doubt McCain would be allowing us to be bullied by tin-pot dictators or apologizing for keeping most of the world free, or setting terrorists loose in our neighborhoods.   Never mind that the financial crisis was perpetrated by the Democrats controlling the purse strings.  Never mind that Bush's policies had kept us free from attacks for 8 years.  Never mind that the Dow was as 14,000+ when the Dems took control in January of 2007 and had dropped 50% in 12 months - it only took them one year to destroy 7 years of fiscal responsibility.  Oh no...the press refused to print any of this.  Instead they nit-picked the Republicans to death.  Can you imagine their zeal if McCain had a questionable birth place?  Wow, they would have crucified this guy and somehow "produced" a birth certificate to show he was not a naturally-born American and thus ineligible to be Pres.  But with all the questions of Obama's birth certificate the mainstream Press just plain avoided the issue.  They wanted this Oreo to be in the oval office.  The blacks who put him in suddenly didn't care he was half-black, half-white.  Can you imagine the hue and cry if it had been McCain who was a mixed breed?  Al Sharpton and Jesse would have been screaming even louder than they are now while calling for a pedophile's ascension to saint-hood.  The liberals suddenly hid their N.O.W. agenda so they could crucify Palin.  Now that she is gone they are back at their gender discrimination efforts - it's business as usual.

If you really want to know what is happening today you must pick up the "mirror" of the world press and look into what others are very aware of...that BHO is a total failure as a patriotic American, as a statesman, as a business manager and as a leader.  He is a capitulator, a doormat, or as the Brits have labeled him:  President Pantywaist.    Use your browser to find international newspapers and find out what you are not allow to find out in our own morning news.   I no longer read daily papers or watch the TV news shows even though I have a dozen or so coming in 24/7 via satellite.  I personally use: 
http://www.inkdrop.net/Dave/news.html  and http://www.geocities.com/~oberoi/newspapr.html to find out what is REALLY going on!!  Try it, I think you will be surprised when you compare the headlines from around the world to ours, and see what others think about our narcissistic head of state.  If you doubt the control of the news, all you have to do is look at this week's coverage of Michael Jackson while leaving coverage American soldiers dying, Ed McMahon and Farah Fawcett in the dustbin. The fact that Obama wrote MJ's parents expressing sorrow over his death while ignoring McMahon's war record and Farah's wonderful work with terminal cancer patients, should be reason enough to kick him out.  However, I doubt Impeachment is possible with a Demo congress (remember slippery Bill) so the only thing real Americans can do is work like crazy so we can turn things around in 2012.  Our country will have a hard enough time surviving the next 3+ years much less another four. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Global Warming...Worlds Resource Shortage...Family Planning - What do they have in common?

 

I have looked in vain for any sort of comment or article or study or recommendation or opinion that there is any connection between our dwindling natural resources (air, water, oil, etc) and irresponsible family planning.  Or maybe it would be more accurate to say No Family Planning!.  We are literally "screwing" ourselves to death...worldwide.  Why cannot normal couples, that is man and woman see the connection between having a raft of kids and running out of clean air and water?   Must be their own personal egos have gotten in the way of their common sense...why else would they deliberately have 3 or 4 children in the face of our global deterioration of essential resources?  Got to be EGO!  Every child born today will be a driver on our already overcrowded roads in 16 years!  Every child today will be sucking in clean air and drinking clean water from the moment they are born, two resources that are constantly overused and in dangerously short supply.  Every child will, in about 5 years, require a classroom and a teacher to babysit them for the next dozen years.  They require food that requires oil, air and water to produce.  Well, you get the idea if you have an I.Q. at least equal to a houseplant!  Most of these mothers seem willing to have someone else raise their kid so they can return to work.  Don't they ever realize this is part of the child-making decision, BEFORE stopping birth control methods? 


Who is to blame for this disastrous overpopulation activity?  Well, first of all, as a readily identifiable group, I blame the Catholic Church, who blindly goes along banning birth control, an idea that belonged in the 16th Century.  Then I blame today's parents who won't let the schools teach sex education.  Then I blame the parents who won't force their children to go to school and actually see that they learn something.  I blame the schools for hiring babysitters instead of teachers. (of course we have to put part of the blame on the unions who insist on tenure regardless of talent)  I blame the government agencies that reward females with children out-of-wedlock...rewards that are sufficient to keep them in the baby-making business.  I blame any institution, private or public, that will not support mandatory sterilization of unwed mothers.  I blame society, both religious and non who do not publicly denounce these miscreants.  Make shame a part of Sunday's sermon again.   How about the parents who support their pregnant daughters and congratulate the father BEFORE the wedding?  Shame on them.  Maybe we need more abortions, at least once then sterilization to guarantee this female doesn't do this again to the taxpayers.  And the man too! Snip Snip!   Yes, the taxpayers are picking up the tab, somewhere along the line, eventually this child will take part in the government payout plans.  Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, Disability...ADC; all adults eventually funnel into this "free" source of money.  


It is time we take responsibility for our actions and not expect the world to pay for our bad judgments.  If we can keep the births down to one family-one child, then maybe over the next 50 years or so the world's natural resources will be able to recover.  If not we need to remind ourselves the all the water on our earth today is all their ever will be...it cannot be manufactured.  Same goes for all the air and all the land...WYSIWYG.    

We have already been publicly warned that humans have exceeded the Earth's "limits of sustainability", now in 2009.  We need to continue to decrease the growth rate of the global population, researchers say as the planet can't support many more people.  


Can you even imagine wars over food? clean air? drinkable water?   When there are more people than there is food to feed them the strong will survive and the weak will die.  It happens every day somewhere in the world today.  We are just more fortunate here in the USA that others.


So, to put an end to this rant, start thinking that a raft of kids is not something to be proud of...it is something to be ashamed of.   As Pogo said "we have found the enemy and he is us".

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I am back after a 8 month hiatus because I am still disgusted!

 I have been sitting on the sidelines since the last election put the most unqualified person in history into the oval office.  A man with an obvious lack of scruples, one who intends to turn this country into a socialist enclave based on Britain's model of inefficiency, corruption and government control of every aspect of a persons life.  BHO is starting with health care, proposing that many needed operations be treated with aspirin.  He has taken taxpayers money and bought shares of GM, after deposing the GM chairman, turning the money over to the unions who continue to screw their own members.  He is quietly attacking the 2nd Amendment from almost every angle except a direct assault, which he will do now that his Supreme Court is in place.  He want this country to be like England, Canada & Australia where only criminals are allowed to have guns.  His course of action is exactly like Hitler's, Stalin's, Mussolini's, and Saddam's in this respect - Remove all possibility for the citizens to rise up against an oppressive government. 

So, in the days and weeks and months to come, I intend to continue my attacks on any person or group of persons who attempt to take away our liberties and freedoms.   Stay Tuned....


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »